You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Motor and functional recovery after stroke: a comparison between rehabilitation settings in a developed versus a developing country
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-82 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthea Rhoda, Mario Smith, Koen Putman, Ratie Mpofu, Willy DeWeerdt, Liesbet DeWit |
| Abstract |
Recovery post stroke is well documented in the field of stroke rehabilitation. The structure and process of rehabilitation are different between developed and developing countries. The aim of the present study was to compare the motor and functional recovery of stroke patients in Germany versus stroke patients receiving rehabilitation in South Africa. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pakistan | 1 | 33% |
| Singapore | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 24% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 24% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 24% |
| Psychology | 7 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2014.
All research outputs
#14,190,698
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,052
of 7,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,188
of 224,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#88
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.