You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Dramatic Increase in Social Media in Urology
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Journal of Urology, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.043 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rano Matta, Chris Doiron, Michael J. Leveridge |
Abstract |
Social media are established tools for rapid information dissemination to a broad audience. A major use has been the compilation of conference specific messaging known as tweets via preselected hashtags on Twitter. We analyzed Twitter use between consecutive years at the AUA (American Urological Association) and CUA (Canadian Urological Association) annual meetings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 12 | 23% |
Spain | 6 | 11% |
Canada | 6 | 11% |
Australia | 5 | 9% |
Brazil | 2 | 4% |
Ireland | 2 | 4% |
Belgium | 2 | 4% |
Philippines | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 11 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 28 | 53% |
Scientists | 9 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 15% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 6% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 48 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Other | 14 | 26% |
Unknown | 10 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 40% |
Computer Science | 4 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 11 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2017.
All research outputs
#836,836
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Urology
#114
of 114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,876
of 238,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Urology
#2
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 114 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.