↓ Skip to main content

Does 3-Day Course of Oral Amoxycillin Benefit Children of Non-Severe Pneumonia with Wheeze: A Multicentric Randomised Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does 3-Day Course of Oral Amoxycillin Benefit Children of Non-Severe Pneumonia with Wheeze: A Multicentric Randomised Controlled Trial
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0001991
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shally Awasthi, Girdhar Agarwal, Sushil K. Kabra, Sunit Singhi, Madhuri Kulkarni, Vaishali More, Abhimanyu Niswade, Raj Mohan Pillai, Ravi Luke, Neeraj M. Srivastava, Saradha Suresh, Valsan P. Verghese, P. Raghupathy, R. Lodha, Stephen D. Walter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Professor 5 9%
Other 15 26%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 55%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 12 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,272,356
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#43,037
of 194,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,619
of 81,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#90
of 320 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 320 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.