↓ Skip to main content

Workplace interventions for smoking cessation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
39 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
313 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Workplace interventions for smoking cessation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003440.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate Cahill, Tim Lancaster

Abstract

The workplace has potential as a setting through which large groups of people can be reached to encourage smoking cessation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 300 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 17%
Researcher 47 15%
Unspecified 40 13%
Student > Bachelor 37 12%
Other 77 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 114 36%
Unspecified 55 18%
Psychology 44 14%
Social Sciences 36 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 8%
Other 38 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2019.
All research outputs
#408,097
of 13,232,114 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,239
of 10,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,164
of 187,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,232,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.