↓ Skip to main content

Multiple Sclerosis: Bench to Bedside

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Multiple Sclerosis: Bench to Bedside
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Multiple Sclerosis: Bench to Bedside
Chapter number 2
Book title
Multiple Sclerosis: Bench to Bedside
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-47861-6_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-947860-9, 978-3-31-947861-6
Authors

Eggleton, Paul, Smerdon, Gary R., Holley, Janet E., Gutowski, Nicholas J., Eggleton, P., Smerdon, G. R., Holley, J. E., Paul Eggleton, Gary R. Smerdon, Janet E. Holley, Nicholas J. Gutowski

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is normally considered a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS), where T-cells breaching the blood brain barrier react against proteins of the axonal myelin sheaths, leading to focal plaques and demyelination in the brain and spinal cord. Many current therapies are immunosuppressive in nature and are designed to target the immune system at an early stage of the disease. But there is no cure and MS may evolve into a neurodegenerative disease, where immunomodulatory treatments appear less effective. Neurodegeneration is influenced by oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) mediated stress which can be induced independently of immune processes. Since 1970, MS patients have been self-managing their long term symptoms using hyperbaric oxygen and reporting improvement in their symptoms, especially bladder control. In contrast, the majority of clinical trial evidence does not support the views of patients. Therefore does oxygen under pressure affect brain tissue by modulating oxidative or ER stress at the cellular level resulting in CNS tissue repair or deterioration? This chapter reviews our understanding and the role of oxidative and ER stress in the context of employing hyperoxia treatments to treat MS and evaluate its effects on neural cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Neuroscience 3 12%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2017.
All research outputs
#17,870,599
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,106
of 4,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,068
of 418,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#314
of 491 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 491 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.