↓ Skip to main content

Psychological therapies (Internet-delivered) for the management of chronic pain in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
86 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
350 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychological therapies (Internet-delivered) for the management of chronic pain in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010152.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Eccleston, Emma Fisher, Randi Brown, Lorraine Craig, Geoffrey B Duggan, Benjamin A Rosser, Edmund Keogh

Abstract

Chronic pain (i.e. pain lasting longer than three months) is common. Psychological therapies (e.g. cognitive behavioural therapy) can help people to cope with pain, depression and disability that can occur with such pain. Treatments currently are delivered via hospital out-patient consultation (face-to-face) or more recently through the Internet. This review looks at the evidence for psychological therapies delivered via the Internet for adults with chronic pain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 344 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 77 22%
Researcher 48 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 14%
Student > Bachelor 40 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 7%
Other 64 18%
Unknown 47 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 29%
Psychology 94 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 13%
Social Sciences 20 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 1%
Other 22 6%
Unknown 62 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2019.
All research outputs
#158,451
of 14,627,579 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#325
of 11,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,233
of 186,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,627,579 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.