↓ Skip to main content

Pancreatic cancer: Circulating Tumor Cells and Primary Tumors show Heterogeneous KRAS Mutations

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pancreatic cancer: Circulating Tumor Cells and Primary Tumors show Heterogeneous KRAS Mutations
Published in
Scientific Reports, July 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-04601-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Birte Kulemann, Stephanie Rösch, Sindy Seifert, Sylvia Timme, Peter Bronsert, Gabriel Seifert, Verena Martini, Jasmina Kuvendjiska, Torben Glatz, Saskia Hussung, Ralph Fritsch, Heiko Becker, Martha B. Pitman, Jens Hoeppner

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a devastating disease. Circulating tumor cells (CTC) in the blood are hypothesized as the means of systemic tumor spread. Blood obtained from healthy donors and patients with PDAC was therefore subject to size-based CTC-isolation (ISET). We additionally compared Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations in pancreatic CTC and corresponding tumors, and evaluated their significance as prognostic markers. Samples from 68 individuals (58 PDAC patients, 10 healthy donors) were analyzed; CTCs were present in patients with UICC stage IA-IV tumors and none of the controls (p < 0.001). Patients with >3 CTC/ml had a trend for worse median overall survival (OS) than patients with 0.3-3 CTC/ml (P = 0.12). Surprisingly, CTCs harbored various KRAS mutations in codon 12 and 13. Patients with a KRAS (G12V) mutation in their CTC (n = 14) had a trend to better median OS (24.5 months) compared to patients with other (10 months), or no detectable KRAS mutations (8 months; P = 0.04). KRAS mutations in CTC and corresponding tumor were discordant in 11 of 26 "tumor-CTC-pairs" (42%), while 15 (58%) had a matching mutation; survival was similar in both groups (P = 0.36). Genetic characterization, including mutations such as KRAS, may prove useful for prognosis and understanding of tumor biology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Other 5 6%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 23 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 14%
Engineering 3 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 25 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,241,936
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#28,013
of 122,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,931
of 313,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,078
of 4,940 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 122,695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,940 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.