↓ Skip to main content

Clinically node negative breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving therapy, sentinel lymph node procedure versus follow-up: a Dutch randomized controlled multicentre trial (BOOG 2013-08)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinically node negative breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving therapy, sentinel lymph node procedure versus follow-up: a Dutch randomized controlled multicentre trial (BOOG 2013-08)
Published in
BMC Cancer, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12885-017-3443-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. M. van Roozendaal, M. L. G. Vane, T. van Dalen, J. A. van der Hage, L. J. A. Strobbe, L. J. Boersma, S. C. Linn, M. B. I. Lobbes, P. M. P. Poortmans, V. C. G. Tjan-Heijnen, K. K. B. T. Van de Vijver, J. de Vries, A. H. Westenberg, A. G. H. Kessels, J. H. W. de Wilt, M. L. Smidt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 145 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Student > Master 9 6%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 50 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 57 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#8,443,746
of 25,826,146 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,300
of 9,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,768
of 327,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#39
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,826,146 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,114 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.