You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Observing a quantum Maxwell demon at work
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1704827114 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nathanaël Cottet, Sébastien Jezouin, Landry Bretheau, Philippe Campagne-Ibarcq, Quentin Ficheux, Janet Anders, Alexia Auffèves, Rémi Azouit, Pierre Rouchon, Benjamin Huard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 29% |
| Spain | 2 | 10% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Grenada | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
| Scientists | 8 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 175 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 28% |
| Researcher | 35 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 117 | 66% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 29 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2022.
All research outputs
#561,283
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#9,760
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,640
of 329,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#211
of 965 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 965 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.