↓ Skip to main content

Validation of the ‘Quality of Life with Implant Prostheses (QoLIP-10)’ questionnaire for wearers of cement-retained implant-supported restorations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Dental Medicine, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of the ‘Quality of Life with Implant Prostheses (QoLIP-10)’ questionnaire for wearers of cement-retained implant-supported restorations
Published in
Journal of Dental Medicine, April 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmen Perea, Jaime Del Río, Arelis Preciado, Christopher D. Lynch, Alicia Celemín, Raquel Castillo-Oyagüe

Abstract

To validate the 'Quality of Life with Implant-Prostheses (QoLIP-10)' questionnaire for assessing the impact of cemented implant prostheses on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). 84 subjects wearing implant restorations were distributed as follows: Group 1 (SD-I; n=35): screwed FDPs (fixed dental prostheses) supported by 2 implants; Group 2 (SD-II; n=7): screwed FDPs supported by 3-5 implants; Group 3 (CD-I; n=36): cemented FDPs supported by 2 implants; and Group 4 (CD-II; n=6): cemented FDPs supported by 3-5 implants. The QoLIP-10 and the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14sp) scales were used. Data related to global oral satisfaction, socio-demographics, health-behaviours, and prostheses, were gathered. Reliability and validity of the QoLIP-10 were investigated. Correlations between both indices were explored with the Spearman's rank test. Descriptive and non-parametric probes were run to evaluate the effect of the study variables on the OHRQoL (α=0.05). The QoLIP-10 confirmed its psychometric capacity for cemented implant prosthesis wearers. Both tests were inversely correlated. The QoLIP-10 attributed the significantly worst QoL to long-span cemented prostheses. Groups were significantly discriminated by the QoLIP-10 performance dimension. The variable complaints about the mouth and the three global oral satisfaction measures significantly modulated the OHRQoL. Patient satisfaction depends upon the extension and the type of retention of implant FDPs.≤ABS-P≥≤ST≥Clinical significance≤/ST≥: The QoLIP-10 may help estimating the effect of cemented FDPs on patients' well-being. When compared to screwed FDPs, short cemented implant restorations lead to greater improvements in patients' self-perceived QoL.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 88 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Professor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 23 26%
Unknown 29 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 30 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2015.
All research outputs
#17,832,890
of 26,123,112 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Dental Medicine
#981
of 1,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,742
of 281,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Dental Medicine
#20
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,123,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.