↓ Skip to main content

Root coverage procedures for the treatment of localised recession‐type defects

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Root coverage procedures for the treatment of localised recession‐type defects
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007161.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chambrone L, Sukekava F, Araújo MG, Pustiglioni FE, Chambrone LA, Lima LA

Abstract

Gingival recession is defined as the oral exposure of the root surface due to a displacement of the gingival margin apical to the cemento-enamel junction and it is regularly linked to the deterioration of dental aesthetics. Successful treatment of recession-type defects is based on the use of predictable periodontal plastic surgery (PPS) procedures.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Egypt 1 2%
Unknown 60 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 25%
Student > Postgraduate 12 19%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Other 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 70%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Unspecified 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 7 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2015.
All research outputs
#1,299,680
of 6,346,178 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,984
of 7,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,538
of 143,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#130
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,346,178 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.