↓ Skip to main content

West Antarctic Ice Sheet retreat driven by Holocene warm water incursions

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
88 tweeters
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
West Antarctic Ice Sheet retreat driven by Holocene warm water incursions
Published in
Nature, July 2017
DOI 10.1038/nature22995
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claus-Dieter Hillenbrand, James A. Smith, David A. Hodell, Mervyn Greaves, Christopher R. Poole, Sev Kender, Mark Williams, Thorbjørn Joest Andersen, Patrycja E. Jernas, Henry Elderfield, Johann P. Klages, Stephen J. Roberts, Karsten Gohl, Robert D. Larter, Gerhard Kuhn

Abstract

Glaciological and oceanographic observations coupled with numerical models show that warm Circumpolar Deep Water (CDW) incursions onto the West Antarctic continental shelf cause melting of the undersides of floating ice shelves. Because these ice shelves buttress glaciers feeding into them, their ocean-induced thinning is driving Antarctic ice-sheet retreat today. Here we present a multi-proxy data based reconstruction of variability in CDW inflow to the Amundsen Sea sector, the most vulnerable part of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, during the Holocene epoch (from 11.7 thousand years ago to the present). The chemical compositions of foraminifer shells and benthic foraminifer assemblages in marine sediments indicate that enhanced CDW upwelling, controlled by the latitudinal position of the Southern Hemisphere westerly winds, forced deglaciation of this sector from at least 10,400 years ago until 7,500 years ago-when an ice-shelf collapse may have caused rapid ice-sheet thinning further upstream-and since the 1940s. These results increase confidence in the predictive capability of current ice-sheet models.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 188 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 23%
Student > Master 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 5%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 27 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 116 62%
Environmental Science 22 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Chemistry 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 27 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 229. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2020.
All research outputs
#69,688
of 15,162,508 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#6,746
of 74,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,785
of 266,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#213
of 777 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,162,508 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 74,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 82.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 777 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.