You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Seroprevalence Following the Second Wave of Pandemic 2009 H1N1 Influenza in Pittsburgh, PA, USA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0011601 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shanta M. Zimmer, Corey J. Crevar, Donald M. Carter, James H. Stark, Brendan M. Giles, Richard K. Zimmerman, Stephen M. Ostroff, Bruce Y. Lee, Donald S. Burke, Ted M. Ross |
| Abstract |
In April 2009, a new pandemic strain of influenza infected thousands of persons in Mexico and the United States and spread rapidly worldwide. During the ensuing summer months, cases ebbed in the Northern Hemisphere while the Southern Hemisphere experienced a typical influenza season dominated by the novel strain. In the fall, a second wave of pandemic H1N1 swept through the United States, peaking in most parts of the country by mid October and returning to baseline levels by early December. The objective was to determine the seroprevalence of antibodies against the pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza strain by decade of birth among Pittsburgh-area residents. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 21% |
| Researcher | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 25% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,391,071
of 25,071,270 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#110,374
of 217,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,990
of 101,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#407
of 740 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,071,270 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 740 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.