You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
3D integration advances computing
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature, July 2017
|
DOI | 10.1038/547038a |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sherief Reda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 116 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 20 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 10 | 9% |
Spain | 5 | 4% |
France | 5 | 4% |
Switzerland | 3 | 3% |
India | 3 | 3% |
Canada | 3 | 3% |
Mexico | 3 | 3% |
Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
Other | 16 | 14% |
Unknown | 46 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 82 | 71% |
Scientists | 27 | 23% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 44% |
Researcher | 5 | 19% |
Professor | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 9 | 33% |
Materials Science | 4 | 15% |
Chemistry | 3 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2017.
All research outputs
#558,671
of 25,507,011 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#24,057
of 98,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,665
of 326,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#439
of 794 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,507,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 794 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.