The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Computer‐generated reminders delivered on paper to healthcare professionals: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001175.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chantal Arditi, Myriam Rège‐Walther, Pierre Durieux, Bernard Burnand |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 2 | 10% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 407 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 406 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 65 | 16% |
| Researcher | 49 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 73 | 18% |
| Unknown | 123 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 103 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 14% |
| Psychology | 21 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 61 | 15% |
| Unknown | 138 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,120,679
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,314
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,511
of 331,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 261 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 261 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.