↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

A phase I/II trial of a polysaccharide extract from Grifola frondosa (Maitake mushroom) in breast cancer patients: immunological effects

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Research & Clinical Oncology, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 2,539)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary News Blogs Twitter Facebook Wikipedia Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A phase I/II trial of a polysaccharide extract from Grifola frondosa (Maitake mushroom) in breast cancer patients: immunological effects
Published in
Journal of Cancer Research & Clinical Oncology, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00432-009-0562-z
Pubmed ID
19253021
Authors

Gary Deng, Hong Lin, Andrew Seidman, Monica Fornier, Gabriella D’Andrea, Kathleen Wesa, Simon Yeung, Susanna Cunningham-Rundles, Andrew J. Vickers, Barrie Cassileth

Abstract

Cancer patients commonly use dietary supplements to "boost immune function". A polysaccharide extract from Grifola frondosa (Maitake extract) showed immunomodulatory effects in preclinical studies and therefore the potential for clinical use. Whether oral administration in human produces measurable immunologic effects, however, is unknown.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 150 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 17%
Student > Master 25 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Other 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 30 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 37 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2022.
All research outputs
#669,811
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Research & Clinical Oncology
#13
of 2,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,481
of 94,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Research & Clinical Oncology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,539 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them

This page is provided by Altmetric.