You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Specific Immunoassays Confirm Association of Mycobacterium avium Subsp. paratuberculosis with Type-1 but Not Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2009
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0004386 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Valentina Rosu, Niyaz Ahmed, Daniela Paccagnini, Gerald Gerlach, Giovanni Fadda, Seyed E. Hasnain, Stefania Zanetti, Leonardo A. Sechi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Ireland | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 38 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 26% |
Researcher | 10 | 23% |
Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 33% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 12% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 7 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,672,079
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#21,528
of 195,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,460
of 172,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#74
of 530 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 530 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.