You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
School Functions in Unaffected Siblings of Youths with Autism Spectrum Disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-017-3223-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yi-Ling Chien, En-Nien Tu, Susan Shur-Fen Gau |
| Abstract |
This study investigated school functioning among unaffected siblings of youths with autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) and identified the correlates for school maladjustment. We recruited 66 youths with a clinical diagnosis of ASD, aged 8-19, their unaffected siblings and 132 typically developing controls (TD). We found that ASD youths had poorer school functions than unaffected siblings and TD. Unaffected siblings had poorer attitude toward schoolwork and more severe behavioral problems at school than TD. Several associated factors for different scholastic functional domains (i.e., academic performance, attitude toward school work, social interactions, behavioral problems) in the siblings included IQ, autistic traits, inattention/oppositional symptoms, sibling relationships, etc. Our findings suggest the need of assessing school functions in unaffected siblings of ASD. Clinical trial registration identifier: NCT01582256. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 21 | 38% |
| Guinea | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 33 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 96% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 129 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 39 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 42 | 33% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 45 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2017.
All research outputs
#1,008,769
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#332
of 5,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,005
of 327,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#14
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.