↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with the use and quality of antenatal care in Nepal: a population-based study using the demographic and health survey data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
267 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
712 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors associated with the use and quality of antenatal care in Nepal: a population-based study using the demographic and health survey data
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-14-94
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chandni Joshi, Siranda Torvaldsen, Ray Hodgson, Andrew Hayen

Abstract

Good quality antenatal care (ANC) reduces maternal and neonatal mortality and improves health outcomes, particularly in low-income countries. Quality of ANC is measured by three dimensions: number of visits, timing of initiation of care and inclusion of all recommended components of care. Although some studies report on predictors of the first two indicators, no studies on the third indicator, which measures quality of ANC received, have been conducted in Nepal. Nepal follows the World Health Organization's recommendations of initiation of ANC within the first four months of pregnancy and at least four ANC visits during the course of an uncomplicated pregnancy. This study aimed to identify factors associated with 1) attendance at four or more ANC visits and 2) receipt of good quality ANC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 712 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 700 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 128 18%
Researcher 78 11%
Student > Bachelor 66 9%
Student > Postgraduate 48 7%
Lecturer 44 6%
Other 127 18%
Unknown 221 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 168 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 158 22%
Social Sciences 59 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 16 2%
Arts and Humanities 11 2%
Other 58 8%
Unknown 242 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,308,704
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#289
of 4,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,736
of 223,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#9
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.