↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of manual wheelchairs by individuals with spinal cord injuries

Overview of attention for article published in Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 253)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of manual wheelchairs by individuals with spinal cord injuries
Published in
Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, January 2006
DOI 10.1080/17483100600573230
Authors

Aileen L. Bergström, Kersti Samuelsson

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 30%
Other 2 20%
Lecturer 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Sports and Recreations 1 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#2,044,970
of 8,106,765 outputs
Outputs from Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
#49
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,987
of 148,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,106,765 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 61st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them