You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Analysis of High-Throughput Sequencing and Annotation Strategies for Phage Genomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0009083 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew R. Henn, Matthew B. Sullivan, Nicole Stange-Thomann, Marcia S. Osburne, Aaron M. Berlin, Libusha Kelly, Chandri Yandava, Chinnappa Kodira, Qiandong Zeng, Michael Weiand, Todd Sparrow, Sakina Saif, Georgia Giannoukos, Sarah K. Young, Chad Nusbaum, Bruce W. Birren, Sallie W. Chisholm |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 206 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 63 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 123 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 14 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Unknown | 27 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2011.
All research outputs
#3,307,102
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#43,481
of 195,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,030
of 166,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#175
of 639 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 639 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.