You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multi-Centre Observational Study of Transplacental Transmission of Influenza Antibodies following Vaccination with AS03A-Adjuvanted H1N1 2009 Vaccine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0047448 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard Puleston, George Bugg, Katja Hoschler, Justin Konje, James Thornton, Iain Stephenson, Puja Myles, Joanne Enstone, Glenda Augustine, Yvette Davis, Maria Zambon, Karl Nicholson, Jonathan Nguyen-Van-Tam |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 21% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 39% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,433,508
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#31,013
of 195,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,221
of 281,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#724
of 5,012 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,012 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.