↓ Skip to main content

TASSEL-GBS: A High Capacity Genotyping by Sequencing Analysis Pipeline

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1344 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1294 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
TASSEL-GBS: A High Capacity Genotyping by Sequencing Analysis Pipeline
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0090346
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey C. Glaubitz, Terry M. Casstevens, Fei Lu, James Harriman, Robert J. Elshire, Qi Sun, Edward S. Buckler

Abstract

Genotyping by sequencing (GBS) is a next generation sequencing based method that takes advantage of reduced representation to enable high throughput genotyping of large numbers of individuals at a large number of SNP markers. The relatively straightforward, robust, and cost-effective GBS protocol is currently being applied in numerous species by a large number of researchers. Herein we describe a bioinformatics pipeline, TASSEL-GBS, designed for the efficient processing of raw GBS sequence data into SNP genotypes. The TASSEL-GBS pipeline successfully fulfills the following key design criteria: (1) Ability to run on the modest computing resources that are typically available to small breeding or ecological research programs, including desktop or laptop machines with only 8-16 GB of RAM, (2) Scalability from small to extremely large studies, where hundreds of thousands or even millions of SNPs can be scored in up to 100,000 individuals (e.g., for large breeding programs or genetic surveys), and (3) Applicability in an accelerated breeding context, requiring rapid turnover from tissue collection to genotypes. Although a reference genome is required, the pipeline can also be run with an unfinished "pseudo-reference" consisting of numerous contigs. We describe the TASSEL-GBS pipeline in detail and benchmark it based upon a large scale, species wide analysis in maize (Zea mays), where the average error rate was reduced to 0.0042 through application of population genetic-based SNP filters. Overall, the GBS assay and the TASSEL-GBS pipeline provide robust tools for studying genomic diversity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 19 1%
Brazil 14 1%
Denmark 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Uruguay 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 19 1%
Unknown 1228 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 325 25%
Researcher 261 20%
Student > Master 199 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 96 7%
Student > Bachelor 65 5%
Other 160 12%
Unknown 188 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 865 67%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 132 10%
Environmental Science 20 2%
Computer Science 18 1%
Engineering 9 <1%
Other 31 2%
Unknown 219 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2016.
All research outputs
#5,074,526
of 24,657,405 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#78,804
of 213,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,570
of 226,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,591
of 5,895 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,657,405 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 213,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,895 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.