↓ Skip to main content

Context-Specific Metabolic Networks Are Consistent with Experiments

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
505 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
682 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Context-Specific Metabolic Networks Are Consistent with Experiments
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, May 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000082
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott A. Becker, Bernhard O. Palsson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 682 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 26 4%
Germany 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Luxembourg 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Other 16 2%
Unknown 626 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 187 27%
Researcher 115 17%
Student > Master 102 15%
Student > Bachelor 46 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 5%
Other 92 13%
Unknown 104 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 241 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 117 17%
Computer Science 62 9%
Engineering 62 9%
Chemical Engineering 24 4%
Other 59 9%
Unknown 117 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,369,297
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#3,583
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,510
of 97,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#13
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.