↓ Skip to main content

Damnum versus Quaestus

Overview of attention for article published in AMA Journal of Ethics, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Damnum versus Quaestus
Published in
AMA Journal of Ethics, July 2017
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.7.imhl1-1707
Pubmed ID
Abstract

Not only is bioethics fundamental to determining or guiding how we live and die, its role as the key interconnecting strand between various disciplines, the public, and decision makers is unique. The works featured here are from a collection entitled "Damnum versus Quaestus" (loss versus gain). They are informed by the lived experience of being with someone (described here as "the patient") as he or she lives through the process of dying.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 100%