You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Aphid facultative symbionts reduce survival of the predatory lady beetle Hippodamia convergens
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6785-14-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kelly Costopoulos, Jennifer L Kovacs, Alexandra Kamins, Nicole M Gerardo |
Abstract |
Non-essential facultative endosymbionts can provide their hosts with protection from parasites, pathogens, and predators. For example, two facultative bacterial symbionts of the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum), Serratia symbiotica and Hamiltonella defensa, protect their hosts from parasitism by two species of parasitoid wasp. Previous studies have not explored whether facultative symbionts also play a defensive role against predation in this system. We tested whether feeding on aphids harboring different facultative symbionts affected the fitness of an aphid predator, the lady beetle Hippodamia convergens. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 74 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 18 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 20% |
Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
Professor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 12 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 64% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 15 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2015.
All research outputs
#4,759,869
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,207
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,698
of 238,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#23
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.