You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dietary Protein and Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0012102 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wieke Altorf – van der Kuil, Mariëlle F. Engberink, Elizabeth J. Brink, Marleen A. van Baak, Stephan J. L. Bakker, Gerjan Navis, Pieter van 't Veer, Johanna M. Geleijnse |
| Abstract |
Elevated blood pressure (BP), which is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, is highly prevalent worldwide. Recently, interest has grown in the role of dietary protein in human BP. We performed a systematic review of all published scientific literature on dietary protein, including protein from various sources, in relation to human BP. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 184 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
| Researcher | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 14% |
| Unknown | 47 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 54 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#468,715
of 25,446,666 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#6,540
of 221,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,151
of 104,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#26
of 798 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,446,666 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 798 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.