@terferatu @Myspoon1984 Marked: NSFW (not really) https://t.co/zgj0BLfHys
@sciencebase Unproductive absorbers of energy? 🤔 https://t.co/l1hBbZ5eBN
@adamboxer1 Add in a bit on copper nanotubes to liven up the class. Really good paper about CuNTs here: https://t.co/htHLypu1XS. Gives me a laugh every time!
@Finndog2018 @Feiryred @Bigshirtlesscol I want to know who peer reviews these without sniggering. https://t.co/0k0pyAx6J5
@catgyoung Although better than discussing Copper nanotubes... Structural and electronic properties of chiral single-wall copper nanotubes | SpringerLink https://t.co/byZuwaRFv4
I just realised today that not everyone knows about The Best Paper Abstract Ever and now I have to share it in case there's anyone else that hasn't read it https://t.co/dHjq0JEkUM
SCIENCE. https://t.co/jIGmWcxwaD
@TomChivers Oh! You reminded me of another field's best entry... https://t.co/OYNr9ZSeDo Worst acronym ever!
@FryRsquared A perhaps NSFW article on nanotubes? https://t.co/YQ1qHXEwfh
@FryRsquared Nothing will ever beat the Copper Nanotubes paper. OK not silly, but hilarious editorial fail - https://t.co/CzGQPxZcIs
@FryRsquared This one on copper nanotubes: https://t.co/XetaTsEYXT
@FryRsquared A paper on copper (Cu) nanotubes (NTs) was all the rage while I was studying chemistry. Can't think why! https://t.co/HRmGlEP1i6
@kidney_boy Just be grateful you’re not working with copper nanotubes. https://t.co/5LLKAZPcrz
Every now and then, academia brings out a proper corker. https://t.co/etrcGbqKol https://t.co/5UZHo14uZi
When writing about science, you need to think carefully about the acronyms you're using... https://t.co/bwMElDVbzH https://t.co/e2DAMkmu97
@fesshole sorry Chinese group https://t.co/a3erc5f452
@robmanuel You need to search abstracts too... Sometimes non-native speakers slip in some beautiful acronyms... https://t.co/NrB1QIvQH9
@darrenhoskins Here you go https://t.co/V7LgdMoBnC
@simonoxfphys You're a wiseman. I assume you've seen this before. https://t.co/jViYCk4l2c
@LindaCHoward I keep reading this academic paper and wonder if it is about the tories because it mentions them so much. https://t.co/FA8HayK4ZU
@mac_puck @rjbarfield1 @AlexTaylorNews Copper nanotube? https://t.co/zWkrDKkIb0
@80_mcswan I think I'd probably have to use the acronym for copper nanotubes https://t.co/zWkrDKkIb0
@AndyParkerVA I think this article is about the Republican Party. It certainly mentions them a lot. https://t.co/FA8HayK4ZU
Hey @thetonymichaels and @AaronParnas, is this publication about The Republican Party? It seems to mention them a lot. https://t.co/FA8HayK4ZU
RT @TheBrexitPartly: Even though they are repeatedly mentioned, this article *isn't* about the Tory party. https://t.co/zWkrDKkIb0
Even though they are repeatedly mentioned, this article *isn't* about the Tory party. https://t.co/zWkrDKkIb0
My lab just suggested this paper for journal club. The abstract is...really something. (buncha smartasses) https://t.co/Z1SIhGy41b
@whippletom I still chuckle at the Copper NanoTube abbrev that made it through review and all the way through to publication..... https://t.co/gmRorI0G6l
@AndersAzimuth But then you would miss out on golden reads such as this (hint.. read the abstract) https://t.co/maDww9eppH
@jerseyphysicist I love many for the science but this one has stayed with me over the years... (I can only apologise for lowering the tone, please forgive me) https://t.co/0f3oOOsZna
https://t.co/k79QU8bFeu Here, here. We'll said sir. Personal favourite linked.
@leecronin May I direct your attention to this paper: https://t.co/u7O8xVCc9p
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
Paging @mrnickharvey
Petition: All journals should have a 12 year old boy on the editorial board so stuff like this could be picked up Unless of course that 12 year old suggested this. Never mind
Yikes!
Name design against potential acronyms is important. That’s why you either should or should not start something called the Program In Medical Physics
This is my new favourite 😂 I know a few folk that are single-wall copper nanotubes😂😂😂
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
They absolutely did this on purpose
Always consider your audience. And have someone outside your world proof read. Or they did it on purpose to see if they could get it through.
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
😂
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
Madlibs, scientific journal edition
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
Four 4 years my job was basically just being the only native English speaker in our department, and this is why…
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
Hot on the heels of Nonce Finance is.....
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
lmao this has @MelanieScrofano written all over it
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
Coming soon to A-level chemsitry smd physics....
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
My BFF sent me this from an article she's reading and I never realized that I had so much in common with copper nanotubes. My CuNT is also "energetically stable and should be observed experimentally in both free-standing and tip-suspended conditions." ht
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
RT @Neurofourier: So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
So…about that acronym 😐 https://t.co/vYAQWxoLqD https://t.co/AfOItyzGwh
@DrNickA Reminds me of the copper nanotubes incident https://t.co/VenFBmDRD7
@cdenningjannace Didn't know @FranzLabDuke was researching copper nanotubes!😂 https://t.co/Lz8yLFuiTG
@ReelBigSmith You mean Copper nanotubes (yes, it gets used) https://t.co/MrHxHGGUUX
@walkerbenjj That’s pretty bad, but it could be worse... https://t.co/yGZgGHOI5C
♥️
@Davidbrcz @krakramille @p4bl0 les copper nanotubes, ou CuNTs https://t.co/wcCzVSRJGI
@SpringerNature did nobody proof-read this - in English? https://t.co/OVaP33MeL7 https://t.co/MKWwvXk8mG
@arndt_eric @Chemjobber @KissellLyndsay @anniegorden @sarahdcady @Al_Chemst Although i am reminded of this deservedly famous gem of a paper... https://t.co/Qh9zd9izcn
@CMastication Copper Nanotubes: https://t.co/yy5BwMpsfN You need to keep an eye on those grad students.
@Liv_Boeree Don't forget about Cu Nano Tubes.. https://t.co/mO9zPyCUiA
Ohhhhhh dear 😂