You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Vectorial Capacity of Aedes aegypti: Effects of Temperature and Implications for Global Dengue Epidemic Potential
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0089783 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jing Liu-Helmersson, Hans Stenlund, Annelies Wilder-Smith, Joacim Rocklöv |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 5 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 590 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 576 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 100 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 97 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 66 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 6% |
| Other | 87 | 15% |
| Unknown | 129 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 143 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 44 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 41 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 24 | 4% |
| Other | 120 | 20% |
| Unknown | 148 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,413,411
of 24,615,949 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#29,758
of 212,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,915
of 226,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#916
of 6,044 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,615,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 212,825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,044 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.