↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating effects of land management on greenhouse gas fluxes and carbon balances in boreo-temperate lowland peatland systems

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating effects of land management on greenhouse gas fluxes and carbon balances in boreo-temperate lowland peatland systems
Published in
Environmental Evidence, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/2047-2382-3-5
Authors

Neal R Haddaway, Annette Burden, Chris D Evans, John R Healey, Davey L Jones, Sarah E Dalrymple, Andrew S Pullin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 5%
Spain 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 67 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 27%
Researcher 18 24%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 5 7%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 33 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 8%
Engineering 3 4%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 7 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2014.
All research outputs
#2,907,446
of 12,018,187 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#97
of 146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,522
of 189,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,018,187 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them