↓ Skip to main content

Locomotor Adaptation versus Perceptual Adaptation when Stepping Over an Obstacle with a Height Illusion

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Locomotor Adaptation versus Perceptual Adaptation when Stepping Over an Obstacle with a Height Illusion
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011544
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher K. Rhea, Shirley Rietdyk, Jeffery M. Haddad

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 8%
Germany 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 52 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Master 5 8%
Professor 4 7%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 27%
Sports and Recreations 7 12%
Neuroscience 6 10%
Engineering 5 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2010.
All research outputs
#5,547,434
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#68,066
of 195,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,180
of 95,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#304
of 724 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 724 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.