You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Role of a Community-to-Community Learning Strategy in the Institutionalization of Community Mobilization among Female Sex Workers in India
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0090592 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Santhosh Sadhu, Archana Rao Manukonda, Anthony Reddy Yeruva, Sangram Kishor Patel, Niranjan Saggurti |
Abstract |
The institutionalization of community mobilization is not well understood in literature. This paper aims to understand the role of the community-to-community learning strategy in the institutionalization of community mobilization among sex workers communities across eight districts of Andhra Pradesh, India. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 42 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 21% |
Researcher | 9 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 10 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 19% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 14% |
Psychology | 3 | 7% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 16% |
Unknown | 10 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2014.
All research outputs
#20,223,099
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#173,293
of 194,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,690
of 221,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#5,278
of 6,065 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,065 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.