You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Airborne Bacterial Communities in Residences: Similarities and Differences with Fungi
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0091283 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel I. Adams, Marzia Miletto, Steven E. Lindow, John W. Taylor, Thomas D. Bruns |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 26% |
| Canada | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
| Scientists | 6 | 32% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 190 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 45 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 19% |
| Unknown | 32 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 35 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 9% |
| Engineering | 17 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 42 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2014.
All research outputs
#3,326,761
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#42,323
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,038
of 239,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,145
of 6,121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.