↓ Skip to main content

Integration of polarization and chromatic cues in the insect sky compass

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integration of polarization and chromatic cues in the insect sky compass
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00359-014-0890-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Basil el Jundi, Keram Pfeiffer, Stanley Heinze, Uwe Homberg

Abstract

Animals relying on a celestial compass for spatial orientation may use the position of the sun, the chromatic or intensity gradient of the sky, the polarization pattern of the sky, or a combination of these cues as compass signals. Behavioral experiments in bees and ants, indeed, showed that direct sunlight and sky polarization play a role in sky compass orientation, but the relative importance of these cues are species-specific. Intracellular recordings from polarization-sensitive interneurons in the desert locust and monarch butterfly suggest that inputs from different eye regions, including polarized-light input through the dorsal rim area of the eye and chromatic/intensity gradient input from the main eye, are combined at the level of the medulla to create a robust compass signal. Conflicting input from the polarization and chromatic/intensity channel, resulting from eccentric receptive fields, is eliminated at the level of the anterior optic tubercle and central complex through internal compensation for changing solar elevations, which requires input from a circadian clock. Across several species, the central complex likely serves as an internal sky compass, combining E-vector information with other celestial cues. Descending neurons, likewise, respond both to zenithal polarization and to unpolarized cues in an azimuth-dependent way.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 128 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 26%
Researcher 21 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 47%
Neuroscience 25 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Computer Science 6 5%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 22 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2014.
All research outputs
#18,550,468
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#1,193
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,979
of 222,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.