You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Disease Control Implications of India's Changing Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis Epidemic
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0089822 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sze-chuan Suen, Eran Bendavid, Jeremy D. Goldhaber-Fiebert |
Abstract |
Multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB) is a major health challenge in India that is gaining increasing public attention, but the implications of India's evolving MDR TB epidemic are poorly understood. As India's MDR TB epidemic is transitioning from a treatment-generated to transmission-generated epidemic, we sought to evaluate the potential effectiveness of the following two disease control strategies on reducing the prevalence of MDR TB: a) improving treatment of non-MDR TB; b) shortening the infectious period between the activation of MDR TB and initiation of effective MDR treatment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 107 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 19 | 17% |
Researcher | 17 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
Other | 18 | 16% |
Unknown | 22 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 32% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 8% |
Mathematics | 6 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 4% |
Other | 20 | 18% |
Unknown | 32 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2014.
All research outputs
#6,878,756
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#81,349
of 194,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,082
of 221,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,249
of 6,065 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,065 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.