You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mitigation Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Italy: An Individual Based Model Considering Different Scenarios
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0001790 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marta Luisa Ciofi degli Atti, Stefano Merler, Caterina Rizzo, Marco Ajelli, Marco Massari, Piero Manfredi, Cesare Furlanello, Gianpaolo Scalia Tomba, Mimmo Iannelli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 14% |
| Mathematics | 12 | 8% |
| Engineering | 12 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 39 | 26% |
| Unknown | 36 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,388,818
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#18,139
of 195,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,278
of 80,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#32
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.