You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost-Effectiveness of Opportunistic Screening and Minimal Contact Psychotherapy to Prevent Depression in Primary Care Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0022884 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthijs van den Berg, Filip Smit, Theo Vos, Pieter H. M. van Baal |
| Abstract |
Depression causes a large burden of disease worldwide. Effective prevention has the potential to reduce that burden considerably. This study aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of minimal contact psychotherapy, based on Lewinsohn's 'Coping with depression' course, targeted at opportunistically screened individuals with sub-threshold depression. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
| Researcher | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 22 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2011.
All research outputs
#14,134,112
of 22,647,730 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#115,397
of 193,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,883
of 120,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,372
of 2,369 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,647,730 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,369 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.