↓ Skip to main content

Infection surveillance after a natural disaster: lessons learnt from the Great East Japan Earthquake of 2011

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Infection surveillance after a natural disaster: lessons learnt from the Great East Japan Earthquake of 2011
Published in
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, August 2013
DOI 10.2471/blt.13.117945
Pubmed ID
Authors

Osuke Iwata, Tomoharu Oki, Aiko Ishiki, Masaaki Shimanuki, Toru Fuchimukai, Toru Chosa, Shoichi Chida, Yasuhide Nakamura, Hiroji Shima, Michihiro Kanno, Toyojiro Matsuishi, Mikihito Ishiki, Daisaku Urabe

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,533,912
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#2,219
of 4,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,467
of 199,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#31
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.