You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Commercial Nucleic-Acid Amplification Tests for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Respiratory Specimens: Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0001536 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daphne I. Ling, Laura L. Flores, Lee W. Riley, Madhukar Pai |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 160 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 44 | 25% |
| Unknown | 24 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 16 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 36 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2016.
All research outputs
#4,747,380
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#65,317
of 195,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,805
of 157,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#107
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.