↓ Skip to main content

Regional modeling: A theoretical discussion

Overview of attention for article published in Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, March 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regional modeling: A theoretical discussion
Published in
Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, March 1997
DOI 10.1007/bf01025361
Authors

A. Staniforth

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 31%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 44%
Environmental Science 4 25%
Physics and Astronomy 2 13%
Computer Science 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics
#111
of 406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,458
of 29,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 406 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them