You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Procalcitonin for diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia in critically ill patients during 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic: a prospective cohort study, systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc13760 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Roman Pfister, Matthias Kochanek, Timo Leygeber, Christian Brun-Buisson, Elise Cuquemelle, MarianaBenevides Paiva Machado, Enrique Piacentini, Naomi E Hammond, Paul R Ingram, Guido Michels |
Abstract |
Procalcitonin (PCT) is helpful for diagnosing bacterial infections. The diagnostic utility of PCT has not been examined thoroughly in critically ill patients with suspected H1N1 influenza. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 17% |
Italy | 1 | 8% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 8% |
Finland | 1 | 8% |
France | 1 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 122 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 22 | 18% |
Other | 12 | 10% |
Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
Other | 31 | 25% |
Unknown | 27 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 53% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
Engineering | 3 | 2% |
Other | 12 | 10% |
Unknown | 31 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,570,352
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,233
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,166
of 235,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#20
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.