↓ Skip to main content

Red cell transfusion management for patients undergoing cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
302 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Red cell transfusion management for patients undergoing cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009752.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kirstin L Wilkinson, Susan J Brunskill, Carolyn Doree, Marialena Trivella, Ravi Gill, Michael F Murphy

Abstract

Congenital heart disease is the most commonly diagnosed neonatal congenital condition. Without surgery, only 30% to 40% of patients affected will survive to 10 years old. Mortality has fallen since the 1990s with 2006 to 2007 figures showing surgical survival at one year of 95%. Patients with congenital heart disease are potentially exposed to red cell transfusion at many points in the surgical pathway. There are a number of risks associated with red cell transfusion that may be translated into increased patient morbidity and mortality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 299 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 14%
Researcher 38 13%
Student > Bachelor 33 11%
Other 25 8%
Student > Postgraduate 21 7%
Other 64 21%
Unknown 80 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 115 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 10%
Social Sciences 13 4%
Psychology 8 3%
Unspecified 7 2%
Other 29 10%
Unknown 100 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#15,174,260
of 25,387,480 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,741
of 12,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,972
of 317,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#180
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,480 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.