↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Jasmonates in Floral Nectar Secretion

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role of Jasmonates in Floral Nectar Secretion
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0009265
Pubmed ID
Authors

Venkatesan Radhika, Christian Kost, Wilhelm Boland, Martin Heil

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 145 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 24%
Researcher 27 18%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 21 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 97 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 9%
Environmental Science 8 5%
Chemistry 4 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 19 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,534,266
of 22,988,380 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#90,098
of 195,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,942
of 94,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#360
of 674 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,988,380 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 674 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.