↓ Skip to main content

Rendering global change problematic: the constitutive effects of Earth System research in the IGBP and the IHDP

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Politics, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Rendering global change problematic: the constitutive effects of Earth System research in the IGBP and the IHDP
Published in
Environmental Politics, March 2014
DOI 10.1080/09644016.2013.835964
Authors

Ola Uhrqvist, Eva Lövbrand

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Finland 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 26 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 31%
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Master 5 17%
Unspecified 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 41%
Unspecified 6 21%
Environmental Science 5 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2014.
All research outputs
#2,015,685
of 3,630,112 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Politics
#74
of 139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,436
of 94,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Politics
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,630,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 139 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.