↓ Skip to main content

Intermediate Phenotypes Identify Divergent Pathways to Alzheimer's Disease

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intermediate Phenotypes Identify Divergent Pathways to Alzheimer's Disease
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011244
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua M. Shulman, Lori B. Chibnik, Cristin Aubin, Julie A. Schneider, David A. Bennett, Philip L. De Jager

Abstract

Recent genetic studies have identified a growing number of loci with suggestive evidence of association with susceptibility to Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, little is known of the role of these candidate genes in influencing intermediate phenotypes associated with a diagnosis of AD, including cognitive decline or AD neuropathologic burden.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
United States 1 2%
China 1 2%
Unknown 58 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Researcher 12 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Other 15 24%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 19%
Neuroscience 7 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 10 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2010.
All research outputs
#20,143,522
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#172,522
of 193,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,409
of 93,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#680
of 704 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 704 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.