You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Brain Responses to Violet, Blue, and Green Monochromatic Light Exposures in Humans: Prominent Role of Blue Light and the Brainstem
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2007
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0001247 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gilles Vandewalle, Christina Schmidt, Geneviève Albouy, Virginie Sterpenich, Annabelle Darsaud, Géraldine Rauchs, Pierre-Yves Berken, Evelyne Balteau, Christian Degueldre, André Luxen, Pierre Maquet, Derk-Jan Dijk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 60% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Norway | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 340 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 4 | 1% |
United States | 4 | 1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 1% |
Unknown | 319 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 66 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 60 | 18% |
Student > Master | 47 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 33 | 10% |
Other | 17 | 5% |
Other | 58 | 17% |
Unknown | 59 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 57 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 12% |
Neuroscience | 41 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 9% |
Engineering | 32 | 9% |
Other | 63 | 19% |
Unknown | 73 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,019,464
of 24,401,594 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#25,194
of 210,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,079
of 163,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#31
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,401,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.