You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improvement of short-term forecasting in the northwest Pacific through assimilating Argo data into initial fields
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Oceanologica Sinica, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13131-013-0332-2 |
| Authors |
Hongli Fu, Peter C. Chu, Guijun Han, Zhongjie He, Wei Li, Xuefeng Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2014.
All research outputs
#5,864,837
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Acta Oceanologica Sinica
#19
of 400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,654
of 194,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Oceanologica Sinica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 400 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them