↓ Skip to main content

Plant stem cells in cosmetics: current trends and future directions

Overview of attention for article published in Future Science OA, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 572)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plant stem cells in cosmetics: current trends and future directions
Published in
Future Science OA, July 2017
DOI 10.4155/fsoa-2017-0026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonia Trehan, Bozena Michniak-Kohn, Kavita Beri

Abstract

Plant regeneration at the cellular and tissue level is a unique process. Similar to animals, the stem cells in plants have properties that help stimulate and regenerate plants after injury. The unique properties of plant stem cells have been a recent area of interest and focus both in developing new cosmetics and studying how these extracts/phytohormones will influence animal skin. This special report focuses on the current evidence-based trends in plant stem cell-based cosmetics and sheds light on the challenges that we need to overcome in order to see meaningful changes in human skin using topical cosmetics derived from plant stem cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 156 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 20%
Student > Master 24 15%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 6 4%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 56 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 10%
Chemistry 8 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 55 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#732,145
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Future Science OA
#14
of 572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,849
of 325,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Future Science OA
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.