You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bone Mineral Density Changes among HIV-Uninfected Young Adults in a Randomised Trial of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis with Tenofovir-Emtricitabine or Placebo in Botswana
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0090111 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Kasonde, Richard W. Niska, Charles Rose, Faith L. Henderson, Tebogo M. Segolodi, Kyle Turner, Dawn K. Smith, Michael C. Thigpen, Lynn A. Paxton |
| Abstract |
Tenofovir-emtricitabine (TDF-FTC) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been found to be effective for prevention of HIV infection in several clinical trials. Two studies of TDF PrEP among men who have sex with men showed slight bone mineral density (BMD) loss. We investigated the effect of TDF and the interaction of TDF and hormonal contraception on BMD among HIV-uninfected African men and women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 168 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 20% |
| Researcher | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 11% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 43 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 39% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 51 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,956,797
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#25,055
of 195,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,902
of 221,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#805
of 5,778 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,778 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.