You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reorganization of Functional Networks in Mild Cognitive Impairment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0019584 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Javier M. Buldú, Ricardo Bajo, Fernando Maestú, Nazareth Castellanos, Inmaculada Leyva, Pablo Gil, Irene Sendiña-Nadal, Juan A. Almendral, Angel Nevado, Francisco del-Pozo, Stefano Boccaletti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 137 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 26% |
| Researcher | 34 | 23% |
| Professor | 15 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 18% |
| Unknown | 17 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 23 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 22 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 19% |
| Unknown | 32 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2012.
All research outputs
#16,363,465
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#144,058
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,762
of 128,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,222
of 1,742 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,742 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.